Okechukwu Nnodim, Abuja
The Transmission Company of Nigeria on Wednesday declared that it had cancelled many non-performing electricity transmission contracts.
It also stated that four of such contracts were cancelled in the last two months, adding that this was part of the reasons why some persons decided to stage a protest against the TCN management on Tuesday in Abuja.
The Managing Director, TCN, Usman Mohammed, also told journalists at the headquarters of the firm in Abuja that the recent closure of the company’s premises by the Federal Inland Revenue Service was unnecessary.
He said, “We are not surprised at the claims made by the rented protesters and this is because we have cancelled so many contracts. We have cancelled many and even in the last two months, we have cancelled about four of them. I’ve cancelled those in Damaturu, Wudil, Walalambi, Dambata, Yawuri and many others.”
Asked why he was cancelling the contracts, Mohammed said, “It is because they were not performing. Why should I leave them to continue the contracts? Look, some Nigerians make this place their farm and continue to collect money on every appropriation, which shouldn’t be.”
He further stated that the prices of most of these non-performing contracts were highly inflated, as some of the projects were eventually completed at rates that were about 10 times less than the initial contract sum.
Mohammed added, “Now tell me, how can we have stable power supply with this kind of arrangement? Also, it might interest you to know that most of these contracts that we cancelled, we are going to complete them at the rate of 10 per cent of what the contract prices were.”
On the closure of the company’s office by the FIRS, he said, “The FIRS did an assessment some years ago before I came to the TCN and they came up with a claim that the TCN owed them N30bn. Now, if you look at the N30bn claim, it includes what we call legacy liabilities. But now the government is looking at how to take over these liabilities which were there before the sector was privatised.
“Also, we have constituted a committee to look into this as well. However, one of the problems that we have as regards this amount that they have against the TCN is that they took our projected revenue and reached a conclusion. But this cannot hold in the power sector because what we get as revenue at the TCN is less than 40 per cent of our revenue.”
He added, “So one element is the legacy liability and the second element is this bogus calculation based on what they think is our revenue. Yes, our revenue is there, but can we collect it? The answer is no because power distributors are not remitting. This is issue.”
All rights reserved. This material, and other digital content on this website, may not be reproduced, published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed in whole or in part without prior express written permission from PUNCH.
Contact: [email protected]
(Visited 1 times, 1 visits today)